Live demo

Real bodycam. Real transcript. In sync.

Press play. Every word lights up as it's spoken, with every speaker identified. This is actual public-record body-worn camera footage, transcribed exactly the way your discovery is.

Viewer advisory Real use-of-force footage. Strong language.
Source: U.S. Customs & Border Protection body-worn camera release, Bisbee, AZ, June 19, 2024 (DVIDS 962405, public domain). Transcript cross-checked word-for-word against CBP's official captions.
The delivered document, live Click any line to jump the video
Loading transcript…
Viewer advisory Real use-of-force footage. Strong language. Source: U.S. Customs & Border Protection body-worn camera release, Bisbee, AZ, June 19, 2024 (DVIDS 962405, public domain). Transcript cross-checked word-for-word against CBP's official captions.
The deliverable

What lands in your inbox

The transcript above is the deliverable: a clean, court-ready Word document in exactly that format: speaker-attributed, timestamped to the recording and the real-time clock from the camera.

Important: this result requires your full discovery

Your transcript will not look like this sample unless we receive all of the relevant discovery for the case. Speaker names, correct terminology, and the real-time clock [in brackets] are reconstructed from the materials you provide:

  • Police / incident reports and charging documents
  • Every camera angle for the same event (body-worn, dash, jail, surveillance)
  • Booking sheets, jail-call logs, witness lists, anything that names the people on the recording

Without complete discovery, speakers can only be labeled generically (e.g. "Unknown Male") and proper nouns may be approximate. The more discovery you provide, the more precise the names and speaker labels: every officer and every subject, identified.

The $50 add-on

The case, already read.

Add a discovery summary and your transcripts arrive with something better than a stack of files: a memo. The facts cited to the record, the State's best case, your best case, and an honest bottom line. Every heading is one click in Word's side panel. Here's an excerpt, built on a made-up DWI so nothing confidential is on display.

CASE ANALYSIS
State v. Daniel Reyes (a fictional case)
Cause No. 30112-CR, 350th District Court, Taylor County, Texas
Sample document. Every name and fact below is invented.
Case Snapshot
Charges

Driving While Intoxicated, 2nd (Class A misdemeanor), Tex. Penal Code 49.04. Open container enhancement alleged (offense report, p. 1).

Key Dates
DateEvent
6/14/2026, 23:42Traffic stop, S. 1st St. at Pioneer Dr.
6/15/2026, 00:06Arrest
6/15/2026Breath refusal documented (DIC-24)
7/02/2026Discovery produced
People

Daniel Reyes (defendant). Ofc. R. Malone (arresting officer, Unit 412). Ofc. K. Tran (backup, referenced but no footage produced). Unidentified 911 caller. Maria Reyes (sister, jail calls).

Statement of Facts

On June 14, 2026 at 23:38, an unidentified caller reported a gray pickup drifting on S. 1st Street. Ofc. Malone stopped the pickup at 23:42 after reporting two fog line crossings; the dashcam shows one touch. Mr. Reyes admitted 'two beers with dinner' (bodycam at 23:47:12), performed FSTs on a sloped shoulder, and was arrested at 00:06:44. During transport he said 'I knew I shouldn't have driven' (bodycam at 00:19:03); no Miranda warning appears on any produced recording before that statement. He declined a breath test at the jail (DIC-24).

Arguments for Guilt
The admission and the refusal

Two recorded admissions of drinking plus a documented breath refusal give the State a clean intoxication narrative, and the refusal is admissible and will be argued as consciousness of guilt.

Six HGN clues on camera

Malone narrates six clues in real time. The video does not visibly contradict the narration, and jurors credit contemporaneous narration heavily.

The transport statement

'I knew I shouldn't have driven' is short, memorable, and on tape. If it survives suppression it is the State's closing line.

Arguments for Acquittal
The stop is thinner than the report

The report claims two crossings; the video shows one touch. An anonymous, uncorroborated caller cannot carry the difference, and everything downstream hangs on this stop.

FST conditions

The walk and turn ran on a visibly sloped shoulder, and the one-leg stand follows 20 minutes of roadside standing. Sally-port video shows normal gait eight minutes later.

The un-Mirandized transport statement

Post-arrest, pre-warning, in response to continued conversation from the front seat. Strong suppression posture on the produced record, which shows no warning at all.

Weight of the Arguments

The State's case is an admission plus a refusal plus narrated clues, all resting on a stop the video only partially supports. If the stop survives, the refusal and admissions make trial risky; if the transport statement suppresses and the fog line video is pressed, the State's margin narrows considerably. The missing Tran bodycam and intox video are worth demanding before any evaluation is final: they either fill the State's gaps or widen them.

Source Index
Cited asFile
bodycamUnit412_Malone_20260614.mp4
dashcamUnit412_dash_20260614.mp4
911 call911_20260614_2338.wav
jail call 2Reyes_call_20260621.wav
offense reportOffenseReport_30112CR.pdf
DIC formsDIC23_24_25.pdf

Click a chevron to collapse a section, exactly like Word's collapsible headings. The side panel is Word's Navigation Pane: one click, any section.

The AI folder sample is the same fictional case as a zip you can drop straight into Claude, ChatGPT, or NotebookLM: the index, the combined case file, the starter prompts, and the advisory on which tools are safe for client material.

Comes two ways: a straight inventory of what's in the production, or the full analysis above. Either one is $50 on top of any transcription order, delivered as a Word document marked as a draft for your review.